{"respondent_id":"c8202c1c-b19f-4333-a539-03cfbe65d7a1","prolific_pid":"69c55e4e2ee9c2bf42d55ba1","study_id":"69cc646c567fdc9a669a4693","session_id":"69cd89e92888669a01d622c7","version":7,"duration_seconds":538.2,"submitted_at":"2026-04-01T21:20:09.747Z","user_agent":"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/146.0.0.0 Safari/537.36","tasks":[{"task":1,"prompt_id":3,"role":"Automated System (A-A-A)","ai_level":100,"domain":"Literature","response_text":"The most charitable explanation for why this book exists is that someone produced it for philanthropic purposes, i.e., they want to sell the book and give the proceeds away to a good cause. The most cynical explanation is that someone wanted to earn money from selling work but not expend the effort of writing it. I think the second explanation is much closer to the truth.","response_time_ms":94293,"interest":"no","credit_ai":100,"slider_direction":"ai_right"},{"task":2,"prompt_id":6,"role":"Technical Realizer (A-H-H)","ai_level":50,"domain":"Visual Art","response_text":"\"We had a hard time visualizing the concept that we wanted, but using AI to organize our thoughts and make it clear what we were after really helped in making the final vision come to life.\"\n\n\"Absolutely — and more than that, I think that art should invite debate and criticism. What we've made isn't just a painting, but a commentary on the use of AI today and where the line should be drawn between work produced by AI and that produced by humans.\"","response_time_ms":96998,"interest":"no","credit_ai":50,"slider_direction":"ai_right"},{"task":3,"prompt_id":9,"role":"Automated System (A-A-A)","ai_level":100,"domain":"Visual Art","response_text":"I always cared for real art — that is, art made by human hands, human brains, human thoughts. In my history classes, I realized how much you could learn from art and the human experience of ages past when you studied them both together, and loved how sometimes there were traces of humanity left in art, like fingerprints or microscopic traces of elements like dirt or grass. When I visited the new art gallery, I was excited until I came across a painting generated entirely by AI. The more I thought about it, the angrier I became. Machines can't replace humans. Machines shouldn't try to replace humans. Art is human, and there is nothing human about an AI-generated painting.","response_time_ms":153751,"interest":"no","credit_ai":100,"slider_direction":"ai_right"},{"task":4,"prompt_id":4,"role":"Creative Director (H-A-H)","ai_level":90,"domain":"Visual Art","response_text":"I imagine that the messaging around this painting is that it is a blend of machine and human, a study into the concept of where art blurs between AI and real work. In truth, though, I think there is laziness underneath there. Real art has, for thousands of years, taken work and dedication and practice, and involving AI in the majority of the creation of it feels cheap and hollow.","response_time_ms":84544,"interest":"no","credit_ai":90,"slider_direction":"ai_right"},{"task":5,"prompt_id":8,"role":"Decision Curator (A-A-H)","ai_level":10,"domain":"Visual Art","response_text":"\"My two-year-old kid can do that at daycare.\"\n\n\"I don't think it's real art if a machine is laying the groundwork.\"\n\n\"It's amazing how far AI has come in the last couple of years!\"","response_time_ms":82563,"interest":"no","credit_ai":33,"slider_direction":"ai_right"}]}